We use cookies to improve your experience and, with your permission, for analytics. Essential cookies are required for the site to work. Learn more
Published October 23, 2026
Many people ask us these days whether voluntary departure is right for them. The worry is understandable, especially with the climate around immigration raids. However, before deciding it helps to know something almost nobody explains: what this option avoids and, above all, what it does not avoid.
Voluntary departure lets certain people leave the country on their own, instead of receiving a removal order.
Its main advantage is that it avoids the reentry bar that comes with a removal order: 10 years in most cases, 5 years in certain arrival cases.
Its main risk is that it does not erase the unlawful presence bar. If the person was in the country a year or more without status, leaving triggers a 10-year bar.
That is, you can avoid one penalty and trigger another at the same time. That is the part that surprises people most.
Before proceedings conclude, the period to leave cannot exceed 120 days. At the conclusion of proceedings, it cannot exceed 60 days.
If the person accepts voluntary departure and does not leave on time, they face a civil penalty of $1,000 to $5,000 and 10 years without cancellation of removal, adjustment of status or other forms of relief.
Exceptions to counting unlawful presence exist, for example for people under 18 and for those with a bona fide asylum application pending.
Someone with no criminal record and a pending application can often fight their case released on bond.
Important: do not make a permanent decision about a temporary problem. That sentence sums up this whole article.
It is the ability to leave the country on your own and at your own expense. That is, instead of ending with a removal order. It is governed by section 240B of the Immigration and Nationality Act.
There are two moments to request it. Moreover, the conditions change depending on which one. On one hand, before proceedings conclude. On the other, at the conclusion of proceedings before the immigration judge.
If granted before proceedings conclude:
Maximum period to leave: 120 days.
Bond: it may be required.
The additional end-of-proceedings requirements do not apply.
If granted at the conclusion of proceedings:
Maximum period to leave: 60 days.
Bond: it is required.
Additional requirements: one year of physical presence before the notice to appear, five years of good moral character, and clear and convincing proof of the means and intent to depart.
Source: 8 U.S.C. § 1229c, voluntary departure. Verified October 23, 2026.
First, that it avoids the reentry bar that comes with a removal order. That is the real reason this option exists. Likewise, it is a considerable advantage for anyone who may someday want to return lawfully.
Specifically, a person with a removal order is inadmissible for 10 years from their departure, in most cases. In certain cases involving people arriving at the border, the period is 5 years. And if there was a second removal, it rises to 20 years. In aggravated felony cases, the bar is permanent.
Therefore, leaving with voluntary departure instead of a removal order spares you that specific penalty. Now, here comes the part almost nobody mentions.
That voluntary departure does not erase the unlawful presence bar. That is, these are two separate penalties from two separate parts of the law. Therefore, avoiding one does not avoid the other.
The rule is this. If someone was in the country one year or more without lawful status and then leaves, they are inadmissible for 10 years. In contrast, if they were present more than 180 days but less than a year and leave before proceedings begin, the bar is 3 years.
What voluntary departure does avoid:
The 10-year bar for having a removal order.
The 5-year bar in certain arrival cases.
The increase to 20 years for a second removal.
What voluntary departure does not avoid:
The 10-year bar for unlawful presence of a year or more.
The 3-year bar for unlawful presence of more than 180 days.
The permanent bar for reentering without admission after certain violations.
Source: 8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(9)(A), (B) and (C). Verified October 23, 2026.
Careful: this is where most people go wrong. For example, someone accepts voluntary departure believing they are leaving "clean." Later they discover a ten-year bar for an entirely different reason.
Yes, several. Indeed, they are worth knowing because they change the calculation entirely. The law says time spent under 18 years of age does not count. Likewise, time with a bona fide asylum application pending does not count. The exception is having worked without authorization during that period.
There are also exceptions for family unity beneficiaries, for battered women and children, and for victims of severe forms of trafficking. In addition, a waiver exists for spouses and children of citizens or permanent residents. For that, extreme hardship to that relative must be shown.
In other words, the count is neither automatic nor obvious. For that reason it is exactly the kind of calculation worth reviewing with an attorney before deciding anything.
The consequences are severe. For that reason the order itself must warn you about them. The law sets two penalties that stack.
Civil penalty: between $1,000 and $5,000.
Ineligibility: 10 years without being able to receive cancellation of removal, adjustment of status or other forms of relief the law lists.
Source: 8 U.S.C. § 1229c(d). An exception exists for certain VAWA cases. Verified October 23, 2026.
In fact, this makes voluntary departure a real commitment. It is not a door left ajar: it is a date that must be met.
Specifically, when the person's life is genuinely already in the other country. There are situations where it is a sensible decision rather than a loss.
Picture someone whose family is in their country of origin. There they have real economic opportunities and no fear at all of returning. On the contrary, it is a country that would welcome them and where they can thrive. Then leaving in an orderly way, without a removal order hanging over them, is usually best.
Likewise, it can make sense for someone who has already weighed every option with an attorney and confirmed there is no legal path to stay. That is, when the decision is made with complete information rather than out of fear.
In contrast, when the person is reacting to a hard moment. And here is the heart of it: do not make a permanent decision about a temporary problem.
In fact, the raids, the news and the uncertainty create enormous pressure. However, immigration policies change and cases move forward. Likewise, options that look closed today sometimes are not. By contrast, a ten-year bar does not change with the politics of the moment.
Therefore, the advisable path is not leaving out of fear. Rather, it is having a strategy: speaking with your immigration attorney, checking whether a legal path to stay exists, and having relatives and support people ready for any difficulty.
In many cases, yes, and many people do not know it. Someone with no criminal record and a pending application that shields them can often be released on bond or on their own recognizance. That applies even if they were detained by immigration authorities.
That changes the picture completely. One thing is deciding from a detention center, in a rush and afraid. In contrast, deciding from home, with time and with advice, is very different.
Important: eligibility for bond depends on specific factors and on the jurisdiction. It is not automatic, but it is not rare either.
We recommend three things. First, calculate with an attorney how much unlawful presence you accumulated. That number determines whether leaving triggers a bar and for how many years. Second, exhaust the review of legal alternatives before giving them up. And third, if you decide to leave, make sure you understand the exact deadline and meet it.
At our firm, that assessment happens in a consultation with attorney Jesús Reyes. Our consultations are not free. However, they allow us to analyze your file thoroughly and tell you honestly what legal alternatives exist in your situation. We also offer emergency consultations, which are scheduled sooner and cost more. You can schedule your consultation here.
You may also want to review our services for cancellation of removal and immigration court representation.
No. It avoids the reentry bar that comes with a removal order. However, it does not erase the unlawful presence bar, which is a separate penalty.
It depends on how much unlawful presence you accumulated. If it was a year or more, the law sets a ten-year bar from your departure. For that reason the calculation beforehand is decisive.
No more than 120 days if granted before proceedings conclude, and no more than 60 days if granted at the conclusion. In both cases a bond may be required.
The law sets a civil penalty of $1,000 to $5,000 and ten years of ineligibility for several forms of relief. For that reason it is not worth accepting without being certain.
That is exactly the question requiring an individual analysis. In fact, having family in the United States often opens legal paths worth reviewing before giving them up.
The law allows requesting it at different stages of the process. Now, deciding from detention and in a hurry is precisely what we recommend avoiding.
Voluntary departure is neither good nor bad on its own. Rather, it is a tool that helps greatly in some cases and proves costly in others. Indeed, the difference lies in each file.
In fact, what decides it is not the mood of the moment, but two numbers: how much unlawful presence the person accumulated, and what legal alternatives remain open. It is important that you know those two numbers before deciding.
If you have questions about voluntary departure or any other immigration matter, contact us. In addition, we handle cases worldwide from our office in Miami, Florida. We are here to advise you and review your specific situation.
See also our frequently asked questions and the other updates on our blog.
Do you need help with an immigration case?
We advise on:
We handle cases worldwide. Contact us to start resolving your case!
For detailed information about our consultations and availability, please contact us.
USA Phone: 888-MI-GENTE (888.644.3683)
WhatsApp (International): +1 (305) 586-9418
Address:
14201 SW 120th St Suite 206
Miami, FL 33186 USA
Visit our website: https://jesusreyeslaw.com/en
* The information in this publication IS NOT LEGAL ADVICE for a specific case. Every case is different, and consulting an immigration attorney is recommended. If you need legal assistance with your case, we recommend scheduling a consultation with our firm.

Contact us for more information about costs and availability.